Opened 3 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
#64813 closed defect (fixed)
litebrowser @0.0.0-20201026_0+debug needs a revbump to rebuild against poco
Reported by: | cooljeanius (Eric Gallager) | Owned by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.7.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | litebrowser |
Description
From rev-upgrade
output:
Could not open /opt/local/lib/libPocoFoundation.71.dylib: Error opening or reading file (referenced from /opt/local/bin/litebrowser)
To confirm:
$ port provides /opt/local/bin/litebrowser /opt/local/bin/litebrowser is provided by: litebrowser
Change History (4)
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 3 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Cc: | ryandesign removed |
---|---|
Owner: | set to ryandesign |
Status: | new → accepted |
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Replying to ryandesign:
I rev-bumped the other ports that depend on poco after it was updated but I didn't do litebrowser because I was trying to update it to a newer version. But then I ran into some problem and forgot about it. Oops.
Hm, wish litebrowser would use actual version numbers instead of commit hashes:
$ port -v livecheck litebrowser litebrowser seems to have been updated (port version: cc098addadc4266d83b779442930e387327c6cc2, new version: e7281239d613fbfb91a756f543d2af61e1d65c23)
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
That's something you'll have to take up with the developer of litebrowser.
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | accepted → closed |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I rev-bumped the other ports that depend on poco after it was updated but I didn't do litebrowser because I was trying to update it to a newer version. But then I ran into some problem and forgot about it. Oops.