Opened 3 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
#65019 closed defect (invalid)
python38 @3.8.13 is rejected from building because of failty checksums
Reported by: | ballapete (Peter "Pete" Dyballa) | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.7.2 |
Keywords: | tiger | Cc: | |
Port: | python38 |
Description
DEBUG: checksum phase started at Sun Apr 17 09:48:43 CEST 2022 ---> Verifying checksums for python38 DEBUG: Executing org.macports.checksum (python38) ---> Checksumming # Error: No checksum set for # ---> Checksumming Python-3.8.13.tar.xz Error: No checksum set for Python-3.8.13.tar.xz The correct checksum line may be: checksums # \ rmd160 cb38b50df2175b37771534b18b5fffd5fc5f90ef \ sha256 e41d6dc61dfa7a840db834519862c6bc784abb4d6a6a52dac7cde93716124456 \ size 3803 \ Python-3.8.13.tar.xz \ rmd160 d5742f8b2e3d60cb2a867816a35fc23a29a4cfd3 \ sha256 6f309077012040aa39fe8f0c61db8c0fa1c45136763299d375c9e5756f09cf57 \ size 19023016 Error: Failed to checksum python38: Unable to verify file checksums
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by ballapete (Peter "Pete" Dyballa)
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by ballapete (Peter "Pete" Dyballa)
I see: other Portfile
s are using an additional line like this:
legacysupport.newest_darwin_requires_legacy 10
Using the patch
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ PortSystem 1.0 PortGroup select 1.0 +PortGroup legacysupport 1.1 +# copyfile +legacysupport.newest_darwin_requires_legacy 8 name python38
for Portfile
does not solve the problem.
comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by ballapete (Peter "Pete" Dyballa)
I found the real bug: I changed the file names on lines
45 patchfiles-append patch-no-copyfile-on-Tiger.diff \ 46 patch-threadid-older-systems.diff
and commented line #46, but left the BACKSLASH on line #45 intact. Python
has started to build…
comment:4 Changed 3 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Could be the problem arises from inserting the line
into
Portfile
in order to work on bug #64178…