gping: Rename gping to something else to resolve conflict with inetutils

[ylluminate (ylluminate)]

Currently inetutils has ping which is installed as gping. Another port, gping (​https://ports.macports.org/port/gping/ ; ​https://github.com/orf/gping) also uses gping and thus conflicts with inetutils.

It seems that perhaps gping should be renamed to something else like graphping or some other name so as to allow both to coexist. There are a lot of other ways of doing this, but I'm not sure what may be preferred here in this scenario.

[Schamschula (Marius Schamschula)]

It looks like gping is written in ruby. I'm not familiar enough with ruby to give any pointers of how to rename it as it's being configured or built (in inetutils I use a configure argument to prepend the g). However, it shouldn't be too hard to do so in post-destroot.

[ylluminate (ylluminate)]

The project shows it's 99% Rust: ​https://github.com/orf/gping/search?l=rust

[Haren S <12570877+harens@…>]

In cf8289de17428f674c9edbd7dd181b8be5e63bb0/macports-ports (master):

gping: update to 1.3.2, rename executable

Closes: #65344
See: #63168

[harens (Haren S)]

It seems that perhaps gping should be renamed to something else like graphping or some other name so as to allow both to coexist.

Thanks for the suggestion. A new version of gping was conveniently released today, so I changed the name and mentioned it in the notes.

[ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)]

In 171a571b6a059f3253c375715b8eba5283037344/macports-ports (master):

inetutils: Remove conflict with gping

See: #63168
See: #65344

[ylluminate (ylluminate)]

Thanks so much. This is fantastic. <3