Opened 23 months ago
Last modified 6 weeks ago
#66600 assigned enhancement
minetest arm64 support
| Reported by: | Zweihorn (@Zweihorn) | Owned by: | Zweihorn (@Zweihorn) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Low | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.8.0 |
| Keywords: | x86_64, arm64 | Cc: | reneeotten (Renee Otten), cooljeanius (Eric Gallager) |
| Port: | minetest |
Description (last modified by Zweihorn (@Zweihorn))
minetest _arm64_ support depends on "irrlichtmt" if correct
Q1: Could "minetest" just add _arm64_ to new Portfile as "irrlichtmt" does support _arm64_ already?
Q2: Would this be reasonable although maintainer (me) doesn't have access to _arm64_ hw ?
Attachments (1)
Change History (9)
comment:1 Changed 23 months ago by Zweihorn (@Zweihorn)
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:2 follow-up: 4 Changed 23 months ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
There are error logs in the PR checks. They show the problem was:
In file included from /opt/local/var/macports/build/_Users_runner_work_macports-ports_macports-ports_ports_games_minetest/minetest/work/minetest-5.6.1/src/client/shader.cpp:43:
/opt/local/include/irrlichtmt/mt_opengl.h:11:10: fatal error: 'KHR/khrplatform.h' file not found
#include <KHR/khrplatform.h>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
comment:3 Changed 23 months ago by Zweihorn (@Zweihorn)
| Owner: | set to Zweihorn |
|---|
Self assigned and a good learning experience.
THX
Changed 23 months ago by Zweihorn (@Zweihorn)
| Attachment: | Bildschirmfoto 2023-01-01 um 13.46.14.png added |
|---|
ERROR pic from the so-called log at macos-11 job GUI view
comment:5 Changed 23 months ago by Zweihorn (@Zweihorn)
| Priority: | Normal → Low |
|---|
Besides the quite valuable advice now set to Low Priority and first things first.
Awaiting future request from users of the "minetest" port with access to ARM64 platform.
comment:6 follow-up: 8 Changed 23 months ago by Zweihorn (@Zweihorn)
comment:7 Changed 6 weeks ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
| Cc: | cooljeanius added |
|---|
comment:8 Changed 6 weeks ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Replying to Zweihorn:
closed by
I don't think so. The PR is closed and the Portfile still contains the line supported_archs x86_64.
Ref https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/17151
Unsure about outcome of Q1 as the first DRAFT _failed for macos-11_
See: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/actions/runs/3816071888
Need some support and advice as no ERROR log apparently and only some empty ERROR message line ??
Will dump the rev2 draft 01 and restart from scratch without 'arm64' in the meantime.