Opened 19 months ago
Closed 18 months ago
#67289 closed defect (worksforme)
lua-luarocks explicitly does not install `luarocks` command ?
Reported by: | jrjsmrtn | Owned by: | MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.8.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | l2dy (Zero King) | |
Port: | lua-luarocks |
Description (last modified by jrjsmrtn)
The lua-luarocks
Portfile explicitly prevents the installation of luarocks
, luarocks-admin
commands in its post-destroot
step:
foreach branch ${lua.branches} { subport lua[join [split ${branch} .] ""]-luarocks { lua.version ${branch} post-destroot { # only install the Lua module files foreach dir {bin etc} { delete ${destroot}${prefix}/${dir} } }
Moreover, performing a sudo port select --set luarocks lua51-luarocks
fails:
Selecting 'lua51-luarocks' for 'luarocks' failed: The specified version 'lua51-luarocks' is not valid.
Is there a reason for that ? Is there another way of installing Lua rocks ?
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 19 months ago by jrjsmrtn
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 Changed 19 months ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Owner: | set to l2dy |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 Changed 19 months ago by l2dy (Zero King)
comment:4 Changed 19 months ago by halostatue (Austin Ziegler)
Installing lua-luarocks
installs luarocks 3.9 and lua 5.3. When you install lua54-luarocks
, you do not get a luarocks5.4
binary, and there is no way to port select
a lua
version or luarocks
version as the bare binaries (like you can do with py3*-pip
and python3*
for either python
or python3
, etc.).
The change for this feels like a regression. I’m not a Lua developer, but if I am explicitly trying to use Lua 5.4 with luarocks, why do I need Lua 5.3 installed — and will the installation of said rocks be applied to Lua 5.4?
comment:5 Changed 19 months ago by l2dy (Zero King)
Cc: | l2dy added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from l2dy to MarcusCalhoun-Lopez |
comment:6 Changed 19 months ago by MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez)
It may seem strange to install Lua 5.3 when installing a Lua 5.4 module.
However, this was an intentional design choice.
To use your analogy of Python, it would be like a Python 3.11 module depending cmake, which in turn depends (indirectly) on Python 3.10.
There is no need for multiple cmake installations.
The old luarocks5.4
is equivalent to luarocks --lua-version=5.4
, so there is no need for multiple installations of luarocks.
port contents lua-luarocks | grep /opt/local/etc
shows the the files luarocks uses to install for different versions of Lua.
The port luarocks_select should be removed as it does nothing useful now.
Truth be told, I forgot about its existence.
As soon as I can get to to, we can increase the default version of Lua to 5.4.
Then, at least, luarocks will depend on Lua 5.4.
Please let me know if I am not being clear or have not addressed your concerns.
comment:7 Changed 18 months ago by MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez)
Can this ticket be closed?
Have the concerns been addressed?
comment:8 Changed 18 months ago by MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez)
Resolution: | → worksforme |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Please feel free to reopen if all the concerns have not been addressed.
Installing
lua-luarocks
port will install the command you need. This change was made in [9047e79b4d7a98442d18d50e811c621aaf788560/macports-ports], where the oldport select
mechanism was removed.