Opened 11 months ago
Closed 10 months ago
#68453 closed update (fixed)
gcc10-bootstrap: update to gcc 10.5
Reported by: | barracuda156 | Owned by: | catap (Kirill A. Korinsky) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.8.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | gcc10-bootstrap |
Description
gcc 10.5 has been released back in July. Will be great to update to it.
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 10 months ago by barracuda156
comment:2 follow-up: 4 Changed 10 months ago by kencu (Ken)
IMHO, there's no good reason for someone to spend the time to try to make gcc10-bootstrap build on Sonoma, even if with sufficient efforts such a thing might be possible.
It's a port used for bootstrapping newer gccs on older systems, and bootstrapping clang-11-bootstrap.
It should just be marked as unbuildable on whatever newer systems it doesn't currently build on, and move on to spend your time on something more fruitful
comment:3 follow-up: 5 Changed 10 months ago by barracuda156
This is fixed by Kirill today. Now it works beautifully on Sonoma.
comment:4 follow-up: 6 Changed 10 months ago by barracuda156
Replying to kencu:
IMHO, there's no good reason for someone to spend the time to try to make gcc10-bootstrap build on Sonoma, even if with sufficient efforts such a thing might be possible.
Bypass all mad zoo of clangs, for example :)
comment:5 Changed 10 months ago by kencu (Ken)
Replying to barracuda156:
This is fixed by Kirill today. Now it works beautifully on Sonoma.
pointless, but good to hear I guess
comment:6 follow-up: 7 Changed 10 months ago by kencu (Ken)
Replying to barracuda156:
Replying to kencu:
IMHO, there's no good reason for someone to spend the time to try to make gcc10-bootstrap build on Sonoma, even if with sufficient efforts such a thing might be possible.
Bypass all mad zoo of clangs, for example :)
I don’t really understand this comment.
comment:7 Changed 10 months ago by barracuda156
Replying to kencu:
Replying to barracuda156:
Replying to kencu:
IMHO, there's no good reason for someone to spend the time to try to make gcc10-bootstrap build on Sonoma, even if with sufficient efforts such a thing might be possible.
Bypass all mad zoo of clangs, for example :)
I don’t really understand this comment.
You are right, I was thinking by habit about older Intel systems, where building clangs is insane, and numerous versions are required – so switching to gcc altogether would make life easier. On Sonoma there is no zoo of clangs, of course :) (Yet, if someone wanted to avoid clang on Sonoma, going via gcc10-bootstrap would still be sensible.)
comment:8 Changed 10 months ago by catap (Kirill A. Korinsky)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Fails on Sonoma still: