Opened 11 months ago
Closed 11 months ago
#68879 closed defect (duplicate)
OpenBLAS @0.3.25_4+gcc9+lapack breaks py*-numpy
Reported by: | fhgwright (Fred Wright) | Owned by: | NicosPavlov |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.8.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | michaelld (Michael Dickens), catap (Kirill A. Korinsky) | |
Port: | OpenBLAS |
Description
This is also true of 0.3.25_4+gcc9+lapack
.
With the latest version:
MacPro:~ fw$ ls -l /opt/local/lib/libopenblas* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 12262592 Dec 11 15:26 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas.0.3.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 21 Dec 11 15:26 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas.0.dylib -> libopenblas.0.3.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 19 Dec 11 15:26 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas.dylib -> libopenblas.0.dylib
With the previous (also non-working) version:
---> Activating OpenBLAS @0.3.25_3+gcc9+lapack MacPro:~ fw$ ls -l /opt/local/lib/libopenblas* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 12262608 Nov 28 12:54 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas.0.3.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 21 Nov 28 12:54 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas.0.dylib -> libopenblas.0.3.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 19 Nov 28 12:54 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas.dylib -> libopenblas.0.dylib
With the latest version that still works here:
---> Activating OpenBLAS @0.3.25_1+gcc9+lapack MacPro:~ fw$ ls -l /opt/local/lib/libopenblas* -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 24052832 Nov 18 00:37 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas-r1.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 15141152 Nov 18 00:37 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas-r1.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 20 Nov 18 00:37 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas.1.dylib -> libopenblas-r1.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 16 Nov 18 00:37 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas.a -> libopenblas-r1.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 20 Nov 18 00:37 /opt/local/lib/libopenblas.dylib -> libopenblas-r1.dylib
The py*-numpy
builds rely on /opt/local/lib/libopenblas-r1.dylib
, which is now missing. Either the dependents need to be rebuilt (revbumped) to adjust their expectations, or OpenBLAS
needs to be rebuilt in a way that provides the missing name.
Change History (3)
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 11 months ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
comment:2 Changed 11 months ago by fhgwright (Fred Wright)
Replying to ryandesign:
Duplicate of #68807 I presume?
Ah, yes. Sorry about that. And I just noticed the Python version split on another system, where I have py{39,310,311}-numpy
OK with the latest OpenBLAS
(and broken with the older one), while py{27,37,38}-numpy
only work with the older OpenBLAS
. That seems to be consistent with the missing revbumps mentioned in #68807.
comment:3 Changed 11 months ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Duplicate of #68807 I presume?