#71220 closed defect (wontfix)
/opt/local/var/macports/sources/selfupdate/base/vendor/tcl/pkgs/itcl4.2.4/configure complains about a C compiler flag
Reported by: | ballapete (Peter "Pete" Dyballa) | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | base | Version: | 2.10.4 |
Keywords: | sonoma intel | Cc: | |
Port: |
Description
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for tclsh... /opt/local/var/macports/sources/selfupdate/base/vendor/tcl8.6.14/unix/tclsh /opt/local/var/macports/sources/selfupdate/base/vendor/tcl/pkgs/itcl4.2.4/configure: line 9259: -I/opt/local/var/macports/sources/selfupdate/base/vendor/tcl/pkgs/itcl4.2.4: No such file or directory configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile
Performing the selfupdate
in GNU Emacs it shows that the string after "-I" is exactly the pathname to the directly in which configure
is running…
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 3 weeks ago by ballapete (Peter "Pete" Dyballa)
comment:4 Changed 3 weeks ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Then AFAICT there is no problem. If the message bothers you cosmetically, you can report it to Tcl upstream if it's not already fixed.
comment:5 Changed 3 weeks ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Replying to ballapete:
/opt/local/var/macports/sources/selfupdate/base/vendor/tcl/pkgs/itcl4.2.4/configure: line 9259: -I/opt/local/var/macports/sources/selfupdate/base/vendor/tcl/pkgs/itcl4.2.4: No such file or directory
This message is what you would get if the configure script tried to execute the command -I/opt/local/var/macports/sources/selfupdate/base/vendor/tcl/pkgs/itcl4.2.4
. Looking at that line the command being run is:
eval itcl_INCLUDE_SPEC="-I${itcl_SRC_DIR}/generic -I${itcl_SRC_DIR}"
Reducing this to a smaller test case:
% eval a="b c" zsh: command not found: c
This does indeed seem like a bug in itcl. Perhaps it shouldn't be using eval
. Two bug reports were already filed about it last year, with no response so far:
https://core.tcl-lang.org/itcl/tktview/7248d8e9ac7c63a5a414
https://core.tcl-lang.org/itcl/tktview/97c5842cd64dbff310c0
And I think I saw it before with 2.10.2…