Opened 3 weeks ago
Last modified 3 weeks ago
#71234 assigned defect
Gnuplot misses x11 terminal under MACOS Sequoia
Reported by: | fpeos | Owned by: | mojca (Mojca Miklavec) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | remkos (Remko Scharroo) | |
Port: | gnuplot |
Description
Dear Gnuplot Experts,
After upgrading to MACOS Sequoia, I installed ports from the source and then reinstalled all my ports manually. After installing Gnuplot, I noticed that the "x11" terminal no longer works. Could this be re-enabled somehow? (The "aqua" term works fine but it becomes super slow when you want to plot 100000 points and it does tell you the x,y values under your mouse cursor, which I often need.)
1) Quartz works fine in my machine. When I type "xterm", it brings up an xterm. 2) In Gnuplot, "set term x11" now yields an error while it worked before the upgrade to Sequoia. 3) "x11" is no longer listed among the available terminals in Gnuplot (type "set terminal" for the list)
So if someone could tell me how to restore the x11 binding for Gnuplot, I would highly appreciate it.
Thanks,
Burkhard
Change History (2)
comment:1 Changed 3 weeks ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Cc: | remkos added |
---|---|
Owner: | set to mojca |
Port: | gnuplot added |
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 Changed 3 weeks ago by remkos (Remko Scharroo)
Indeed, it was the developers themselves that decided that the Qt5 terminal is better. See: http://www.gnuplot.info/ReleaseNotes_6_0_1.html
Here the developers say about X11 (the "classic" interactive interface): "This used to be the preferred interactive interface, but the newer wxt and qt terminals offer nicer output and a wider range of features."
See also https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/25789 for the decision process during the last port update to version 6.0.1 to adopt the developers suggestion to no longer favour the X11 terminal.
Looks like the x11 variant is still available, just not on by default:
Presumably someone decided that the Qt5 terminal is better?