Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 10 years ago
#46860 assigned submission
Add EasySDL C lib
Reported by: | nyuubi.10@… | Owned by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | EasySDL |
Description
SDL lib, EasySDL permit to create program / game with SDL 1.2 easily.
Main repository: https://github.com/Ousret/EasySDL Pub: http://spitajoke.com/tahri/EasySDL/pub/
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by nyuubi.10@…
Cc: | nyuubi.10@… added |
---|
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Cc: | nyuubi.10@… removed |
---|---|
Keywords: | Simple SDL dev extended SDL API removed |
Version: | 2.3.3 |
Thanks. As reporter you do not need to Cc yourself.
A few observations:
- The revision line should be removed because it starts at zero and that is the default.
- This appears to use cmake and so it should use the cmake portgroup.
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by nyuubi.10@…
Thank you for your answer, I've updated Portfile.
Now working.
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to ryandesign@… |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
Thanks.
This line is not necessary because the github portgroup already does it for you:
depends_build port:cmake
There were a few tabs in the Portfile that need to be converted to spaces.
The port does not configure or build because it extracts to a nonstandard directory name, which appears to be of the kind that github would produce. Did you just take a tarball from github and upload it to http://spitajoke.com/tahri/EasySDL/pub/? If so, it would be simpler to just have the port download from github directly, using the github portgroup, which knows how to deal with the unusual directory names in their downloads.
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Replying to ryandesign@…:
it would be simpler to just have the port download from github directly, using the github portgroup, which knows how to deal with the unusual directory names in their downloads.
I see the problem with that idea: the Portfile is for version 0.6.1, but no 0.6.1 tag exists in the github repository. (A tag for 0.6.1-beta exists, however.) I assume you are also the developer of this software? If you have released the final non-beta version of 0.6.1, could you create a 0.6.1 tag in the repository? Then we'll have the port fetch its tarball from github.
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by nyuubi.10@…
Github tag 0.6.1-beta mv to 0.6.1 And yes, github portgroup would be for the best.
Cc Me!