kdepim4 @4.14.3 does not build under OSX 10.9

[tryingkaspersky@…]

kdepim4 @4.14.3 will not build. Other kde related packages seem to build normally.

[tryingkaspersky@…]

log

[RJVB (René Bertin)]

Strange that this comes up only now; surely someone must have tested kdepim 4.14.3 before? (Not me, I learned on Linux that I was going to want to stick to kdepim 4.13.3 ...)

Could you try to edit /opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_kde_kdepim4/kdepim4/work/kdepim-4.14.3/blogilo/src/blogger.h such that the call on line 96 becomes

void authenticate(const AuthData_t &authData = AuthData_t());

with the definition for AuthData_t

typedef QMap<QString, QString> AuthData_t;

at an appropriate location before the authenticate() definition?

Then just repeat the failed port command, it should continue where it left off.

[RJVB (René Bertin)]

BTW: I see you apparently have an octocore set-up. Next time when uploading a build log, could you please 1) save the initial (full) build log 2) repeat the failed port command

If that fails with the same error, upload only the refreshed, shorter log. It'll be easier to track compiler errors in there; if you keep the full log it can always be uploaded later should we need it.

[tryingkaspersky@…]

rjvbertin,

I just followed the instructions you gave on comment:2 and it worked nicely.

[RJVB (René Bertin)]

Great.

@Nicos: should we create a patch for MacPorts for this or submit one on KDE's ReviewBoard?

[NicosPavlov]

Thanks for looking at that one.

As it is an issue which is known now, I added a patch in r133859. It is not incompatible with sending it to the review board, though.

[mkae (Marko Käning)]

René, will you post or have you already posted this on KDE's RB?

[RJVB (René Bertin)]

I'm not sure that'll have a lot of impact ... unless this code has made it unmodified to the KF5 version?

[mkae (Marko Käning)]

I've created an ​RR at KDE's RB for this, as development is still ongoing on kdepim4, as it seems from its git repo.

[RJVB (René Bertin)]

Can someone please double-check if the patch (patch-blogger.diff) is still required with an up-to-date Xcode (v6.2) for 10.9? It doesn't appear to be the case for me.

[mkae (Marko Käning)]

I built this successfully with xcode 6.1.1 - i.e. the patch wasn't needed anymore!

So, I guess, one can silently remove the patch file from the port, as done in r141786.