Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 9 years ago
#47088 new request
Portfile for pypy-pip
Reported by: | rlmaers (Rafael Lukas Maers) | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.3.3 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: |
Description
Hi,
I've installed pypy, and would greatly appreciate a port for pip. That is: pip for pypy, such that I could install additional modules which are recognized by pypy.
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by rlmaers (Rafael Lukas Maers)
Cc: | rlmaers@… added |
---|
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by Ionic (Mihai Moldovan)
Cc: | rlmaers@… removed |
---|
The reporter always gets notifications on changes.
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
This would be different somehow from the existing py27-pip port?
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Presumably the new port would depend on and install modules for PyPy instead of CPython.
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by rlmaers (Rafael Lukas Maers)
That is correct. As of right now, there is no way to install additional modules without tampering with the MacPorts installation or installing pypy outside of the scope of MacPorts (at least as far as I know).
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by petrrr
I believe this request is formally not completely accurate.
What we probably want here is an enhancement of the Python Portgroup, so that py-
ports could be configurable to install modules against the PyPy interpreter. That is something like
`
python.versions py 27 34
`
(or python.add_pypy yes
, or what ever) would enable a pypy-
subport, and pypy-pip
(or pypy-setuptools
) would be only one of these.
Note also, that it is probably not desirable users use pip directly into a site-packages location.
Cc Me!