Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#56756 new defect
Build doesn't honor --bindir, --libexecdir, etc.
Reported by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | base | Version: | 2.5.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | mojca (Mojca Miklavec) | |
Port: |
Description
./configure --help
advertises these standard autoconf flags:
--exec-prefix=EPREFIX install architecture-dependent files in EPREFIX [PREFIX]
--bindir=DIR user executables [EPREFIX/bin] --sbindir=DIR system admin executables [EPREFIX/sbin] --libexecdir=DIR program executables [EPREFIX/libexec] --sysconfdir=DIR read-only single-machine data [PREFIX/etc] --sharedstatedir=DIR modifiable architecture-independent data [PREFIX/com] --localstatedir=DIR modifiable single-machine data [PREFIX/var] --libdir=DIR object code libraries [EPREFIX/lib] --includedir=DIR C header files [PREFIX/include] --oldincludedir=DIR C header files for non-gcc [/usr/include] --datarootdir=DIR read-only arch.-independent data root [PREFIX/share] --datadir=DIR read-only architecture-independent data [DATAROOTDIR] --infodir=DIR info documentation [DATAROOTDIR/info] --localedir=DIR locale-dependent data [DATAROOTDIR/locale] --mandir=DIR man documentation [DATAROOTDIR/man]
But the MacPorts build doesn't work correctly if these flags are set to non-default values.
For example, if I specify --prefix=/prefix --bindir=/prefix/bindir
, the build doesn't have an error, but the directory /prefix/bindir is not created, and the daemondo executable is installed as /prefix/bindir; all other binaries are installed in /prefix/bin.
Or if I specify --prefix=/prefix --libexecdir=/prefix/libexecdir
, then the build fails with
chmod: ...vendor/vendor-destroot/prefix/libexec/macports/lib/tcllib*: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [destroot-tcllib] Error 1
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by raimue (Rainer Müller)
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
I don't know. They are a standard feature of autoconf. Presumably the developers of autoconf had reason to make this feature available.
Is there even a way to remove them from our configure script? I don't recall ever seeing an autoconf configure script without them.
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by mojca (Mojca Miklavec)
Cc: | mojca added |
---|
Is there any use case for these configure arguments? I suggest we just get rid of them.