Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 3 months ago
#56757 new defect
reclaim removed my ports without asking
Reported by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | base | Version: | 2.5.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg), cooljeanius (Eric Gallager) | |
Port: |
Description
I just ran sudo port reclaim
successfully for the first time on my main system. (The last time I tried to run it, it encountered an error.)
It immediately uninstalled 941 ports, which surprised me. I don't understand why the ports were immediately removed, without asking me, since man port-reclaim
states "No files are removed initially, until the user selects them from the provided list."
Change History (7)
comment:1 follow-up: 3 Changed 6 years ago by kencu (Ken)
comment:3 follow-up: 6 Changed 6 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Replying to kencu:
Do you have
# Whether the user interface should ask interactive questions #ui_interactive yesset to "no" ?
Yes. I do not want to constantly be asked whether I would like to install dependencies. I always want to install dependencies. I want installing ports to work the way it did before the interactive UI feature was added.
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
Cc: | kurthindenburg added |
---|
Was there any suggestions on how to fix this or is this just the way it is now (ui_interactive applies to all questions)?
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
I'm not aware of any work on improving this. I still use ui_interactive no
, and I don't use reclaim.
comment:6 Changed 3 months ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Replying to ryandesign:
Yes. I do not want to constantly be asked whether I would like to install dependencies. I always want to install dependencies. I want installing ports to work the way it did before the interactive UI feature was added.
Maybe some additional granularity in the controls over interactivity would be helpful? See ticket #68953 for a related idea I had
comment:7 Changed 3 months ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Cc: | cooljeanius added |
---|
Do you have
set to "no" ?