Opened 6 years ago

Last modified 3 months ago

#56757 new defect

reclaim removed my ports without asking

Reported by: ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) Owned by:
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: base Version: 2.5.2
Keywords: Cc: kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg), cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Port:

Description

I just ran sudo port reclaim successfully for the first time on my main system. (The last time I tried to run it, it encountered an error.)

It immediately uninstalled 941 ports, which surprised me. I don't understand why the ports were immediately removed, without asking me, since man port-reclaim states "No files are removed initially, until the user selects them from the provided list."

Change History (7)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by kencu (Ken)

Do you have

# Whether the user interface should ask interactive questions
#ui_interactive         yes

set to "no" ?

comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)

Cf. #53857

comment:3 in reply to:  1 ; Changed 6 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)

Replying to kencu:

Do you have

# Whether the user interface should ask interactive questions
#ui_interactive         yes

set to "no" ?

Yes. I do not want to constantly be asked whether I would like to install dependencies. I always want to install dependencies. I want installing ports to work the way it did before the interactive UI feature was added.

comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)

Cc: kurthindenburg added

Was there any suggestions on how to fix this or is this just the way it is now (ui_interactive applies to all questions)?

comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)

I'm not aware of any work on improving this. I still use ui_interactive no, and I don't use reclaim.

comment:6 in reply to:  3 Changed 3 months ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)

Replying to ryandesign:

Yes. I do not want to constantly be asked whether I would like to install dependencies. I always want to install dependencies. I want installing ports to work the way it did before the interactive UI feature was added.

Maybe some additional granularity in the controls over interactivity would be helpful? See ticket #68953 for a related idea I had

comment:7 Changed 3 months ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)

Cc: cooljeanius added
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.