#8812 closed submission (fixed)
NEW: tin-recent port
Reported by: | vincent-opdarw@… | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 1.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | markd@… vinc17@… | |
Port: |
Description
I'm proposing the following tin port (Portfile will be attached). To make this clear, I've described the Tin development model and the Portfile update policy as a comment in the Portfile. Here's a copy:
# The Tin development model is based on patchsets, as indicated in # the doc/CHANGES file. There are: # * stable patches, numbered ddd (001, 002, and so on), which are # applied to the current stable branch, and in general, to the # unstable branch too (i.e. when this makes sense); # * unstable patches (new features), numbered Uddd (U001, U002, # and so on), which are applied to the unstable branch only. # At some point, the unstable branch is regarded as stable, making # a new stable release and a new stable branch. Then this branch # gets stable patches as usual (fixes, translation updates...). # A new unstable branch is created (split from the current stable # branch) as soon as the first unstable patch (U001) needs to be # applied.
# Portfile update policy: Follow the development line as shown on # <http://www.tin.org/history.html>, preferring unstable versions # to stable ones when there is a split. # The goal of this tin-recent port (as opposed to tin and tin-devel) # is to have the highest upstream version (regarded as either stable # or unstable), i.e. with the latest features, using a single port, # thus benefiting from some port management features, such as those # provided by "port outdated" and "port upgrade".
Attachments (3)
Change History (12)
Changed 19 years ago by vincent-opdarw@…
comment:1 Changed 18 years ago by rhwood@…
severity: | normal → enhancement |
---|
Updates and new ports are enhancements
comment:2 Changed 18 years ago by markd@…
Cc: | markd@… added |
---|
I don't understand the need for 3 ports. Shouldn't tin-devel be updated to 1.9.1?
comment:3 Changed 18 years ago by markd@…
Oh I missed the relevant comments. Well I'm not sufficiently aware development models to know if this is as weird as it sounds or not. 3 ports sure is ugly though.
comment:4 Changed 18 years ago by kballard (Lily Ballard)
Milestone: | → New Ports |
---|
Changed 18 years ago by pipping@…
Attachment: | Portfile.2 added |
---|
new portfile (1.9.2, make variant ncurses default)
Changed 17 years ago by vinc17@…
Attachment: | Portfile.3 added |
---|
new portfile (removed --enable-debug, reformatted, *FLAGS clean-up, livecheck)
comment:5 Changed 17 years ago by vinc17@…
Cc: | markd@… added; markd@… removed |
---|
comment:6 Changed 17 years ago by pipping@…
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
committed in r25830.
comment:7 Changed 17 years ago by jmpalacios (Juan Manuel Palacios)
Milestone: | New Ports → Port Submissions |
---|
Milestone New Ports deleted
comment:8 Changed 16 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Type: | enhancement → submission |
---|
comment:9 Changed 16 years ago by (none)
Milestone: | Port Submissions |
---|
Milestone Port Submissions deleted
Portfile for tin-recent 1.9.1