Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#17709 closed enhancement (fixed)
dovecot variant +mysql
| Reported by: | pixilla (Bradley Giesbrecht) | Owned by: | jberry@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 1.7.0 |
| Keywords: | mysql | Cc: | scott@…, ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt), terry@… |
| Port: | dovecot |
Description
I need dovecot with mysql.
There is a postgres variant but no mysql.
Note: mysql version 4.1+ requires the the mysqli driver.
Attachments (1)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by pixilla (Bradley Giesbrecht)
| Cc: | brad@… added |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Cc: | brad@… removed |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | dovecot removed |
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to jberry@… |
| Port: | dovecot added |
Assigning to maintainer.
comment:3 follow-up: 6 Changed 16 years ago by scott@…
What will it take to get this approved? I have some further patches I want to submit, and would like to work them against this portfile, not the one currently in use.
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by (none)
| Milestone: | Port Enhancements |
|---|
Milestone Port Enhancements deleted
comment:6 follow-up: 7 Changed 15 years ago by raimue (Rainer Müller)
Replying to scott@…:
What will it take to get this approved? I have some further patches I want to submit, and would like to work them against this portfile, not the one currently in use.
Attaching a patch with the new variant would be a good start. It does not look like jberry has the time to add this himself.
comment:7 follow-up: 8 Changed 15 years ago by scott@…
Replying to raimue@…:
Replying to scott@…:
What will it take to get this approved? I have some further patches I want to submit, and would like to work them against this portfile, not the one currently in use.
Attaching a patch with the new variant would be a good start. It does not look like jberry has the time to add this himself.
Ugh, my bad, I was meaning to follow into #19432 not this one, which looks to me like it was just approved, thanks.
comment:8 Changed 15 years ago by scott@…
Replying to scott@…:
Replying to raimue@…:
Replying to scott@…:
What will it take to get this approved? I have some further patches I want to submit, and would like to work them against this portfile, not the one currently in use.
Attaching a patch with the new variant would be a good start. It does not look like jberry has the time to add this himself.
Ugh, my bad, I was meaning to follow into #19432 not this one, which looks to me like it was just approved, thanks.
Actually, no, that is not correct. If I run port info in my local ports, I get Variants: darwin_7, darwin_8, darwin_9, ldap, mysql5, postgres, rawlog, universal
Let me track down where this is, I am near certain it is already i trac
Changed 15 years ago by scott@…
| Attachment: | patch-Portfile added |
|---|
mysql5 variant, supplied to me from brad, who is on this ticket
comment:9 Changed 15 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Cc: | ryandesign@… terry@… added |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → fixed |
| Status: | new → closed |
Added a mysql5 variant in r63164.
Cc Me!